_CORE
AI & Agentic Systems Core Information Systems Cloud & Platform Engineering Data Platform & Integration Security & Compliance QA, Testing & Observability IoT, Automation & Robotics Mobile & Digital Banking & Finance Insurance Public Administration Defense & Security Healthcare Energy & Utilities Telco & Media Manufacturing Logistics & E-commerce Retail & Loyalty
References Technologies Blog Know-how Tools
About Collaboration Careers
CS EN
Let's talk

ChromaDB vs Pinecone

22. 07. 2025 1 min read intermediate

ChromaDB for prototypes and smaller projects, Pinecone for production without ops.

ChromaDB

  • Open-source, embedded (or server mode)
  • Python-first API
  • Auto-embedding support
  • Ideal for prototypes and smaller datasets
  • Free, self-hosted

Pinecone

  • Fully managed serverless
  • High performance and availability
  • Metadata filtering
  • Namespaces for multi-tenancy
  • Pay-per-usage

Comparison

  • Setup: ChromaDB = pip install, Pinecone = API key
  • Scale: Pinecone for millions of vectors, ChromaDB for thousands to hundreds of thousands
  • Ops: Pinecone zero, ChromaDB self-managed
  • Price: ChromaDB free, Pinecone from $0 (free tier) to $$
  • Lock-in: ChromaDB none, Pinecone vendor

When to Use Which

  • ChromaDB — prototypes, POC, embedded in app, budget-conscious
  • Pinecone — production, high availability, zero ops

ChromaDB to Start, Pinecone for Production

Start with ChromaDB, migrate to Pinecone or Qdrant for production.

chromadbpineconevector db
Share:

CORE SYSTEMS tým

Stavíme core systémy a AI agenty, které drží provoz. 15 let zkušeností s enterprise IT.