Skip to content
_CORE
AI & Agentic Systems Core Information Systems Cloud & Platform Engineering Data Platform & Integration Security & Compliance QA, Testing & Observability IoT, Automation & Robotics Mobile & Digital Banking & Finance Insurance Public Administration Defense & Security Healthcare Energy & Utilities Telco & Media Manufacturing Logistics & E-commerce Retail & Loyalty
References Technologies Blog Know-how Tools
About Collaboration Careers
CS EN DE
Let's talk

Code review — how we do it and why it's essential

06. 08. 2013 Updated: 24. 03. 2026 1 min read CORE SYSTEMSdevelopment
This article was published in 2013. Some information may be outdated.
Code review — how we do it and why it's essential

Since moving to Git we have made pull requests a mandatory part of our workflow. No code gets into develop without a review. After six months we’re sharing our experience.

Process

Feature branch, code, push, pull request. At least one reviewer approval required. Comments, fixes, approval, merge.

Checklist

Does it fulfill the user story? Unit tests? No code duplication? Clear naming? Security issues? Error handling? Readability?

Culture

Review is not a critique of the author, it’s an improvement of the code. Constructive tone. Not “this is wrong” but “have you considered this approach?”

Results

Average of 2.3 bugs per PR found before merge. Knowledge sharing. Consistent codebase. Average review time: 30 minutes.

Rules

  1. Review within 24 hours. 2. Small PRs (under 200 lines). 3. Descriptive PR description. 4. Constructive tone.
code reviewkvalitagitprocesy
Share:

CORE SYSTEMS

We build core systems and AI agents that keep operations running. 15 years of experience with enterprise IT.

Need help with implementation?

Our experts can help with design, implementation, and operations. From architecture to production.

Contact us
Need help with implementation? Schedule a meeting