_CORE
AI & Agentic Systems Core Information Systems Cloud & Platform Engineering Data Platform & Integration Security & Compliance QA, Testing & Observability IoT, Automation & Robotics Mobile & Digital Banking & Finance Insurance Public Administration Defense & Security Healthcare Energy & Utilities Telco & Media Manufacturing Logistics & E-commerce Retail & Loyalty
References Technologies Blog Know-how Tools
About Collaboration Careers
CS EN
Let's talk

Container orchestration: Kubernetes vs Mesos vs Swarm

20. 10. 2015 2 min read CORE SYSTEMScloud
Container orchestration: Kubernetes vs Mesos vs Swarm

A comparison of the three main container orchestration platforms — Kubernetes, Apache Mesos/Marathon, and Docker Swarm. Architecture, strengths, and when to choose which.

Why orchestration?

Docker solved packaging and the runtime for individual containers. But in production you need to:

  • Run hundreds to thousands of containers across clusters
  • Automatically restart failed containers
  • Scale services based on load
  • Roll out deployments without downtime
  • Manage networking and storage

Orchestrators automate these operational tasks.

Kubernetes — Google DNA

Kubernetes brings decades of Google experience with Borg. Key strengths:

  • Declarative model — you describe the desired state; K8s maintains it
  • Rich API and extensibility
  • Largest community and ecosystem
  • Support from all major cloud providers

Weaknesses: steep learning curve, complex setup on bare metal, higher operational overhead for small teams.

Mesos/Marathon — the data centre as a computer

Apache Mesos is battle-tested at Twitter, Apple, and Airbnb for tens of thousands of nodes. Marathon is a container orchestration framework running on top of Mesos.

Strengths:

  • Extreme scalability (10,000+ nodes)
  • Multi-workload — containers, Hadoop, Spark on a single cluster
  • Mature and stable

Weaknesses: more complex architecture (Mesos + Marathon + ZooKeeper), smaller community specifically around containers.

Docker Swarm — simplicity

Docker Swarm is Docker’s native orchestration. The goal: simplicity and a low barrier to entry.

Strengths:

  • Integrated in Docker Engine
  • Docker CLI compatibility — no new tools required
  • Simplest setup and learning curve

Weaknesses: fewer features than K8s, smaller ecosystem, uncertain future (the Docker vs Kubernetes battle).

For small teams and straightforward deployments, Swarm may be the most practical choice.

Conclusion: Kubernetes is the safe bet

In 2015 the battle is still open, but Kubernetes’s momentum is undeniable. For enterprise projects we recommend Kubernetes as the strategic platform. For small projects, consider Docker Swarm. Mesos makes sense for organisations with extreme scaling requirements.

kontejneryorchestracekubernetesmesosdocker swarmdevops
Share:

CORE SYSTEMS

Stavíme core systémy a AI agenty, které drží provoz. 15 let zkušeností s enterprise IT.

Need help with implementation?

Our experts can help with design, implementation, and operations. From architecture to production.

Contact us