_CORE
AI & Agentic Systems Core Information Systems Cloud & Platform Engineering Data Platform & Integration Security & Compliance QA, Testing & Observability IoT, Automation & Robotics Mobile & Digital Banking & Finance Insurance Public Administration Defense & Security Healthcare Energy & Utilities Telco & Media Manufacturing Logistics & E-commerce Retail & Loyalty
References Technologies Blog Know-how Tools
About Collaboration Careers
CS EN
Let's talk

Isomorphic JavaScript: shared code between server and client

07. 06. 2015 2 min read CORE SYSTEMSdevelopment
Isomorphic JavaScript: shared code between server and client

Isomorphic (universal) JavaScript enables React and other frameworks to render on both server and client. Why it matters for SEO, performance, and user experience.

The problem with single-page applications

SPA frameworks (Angular, React, Ember) moved rendering into the browser. The advantage is smooth interaction, but the downsides are significant:

  • SEO — crawlers do not see content rendered by JavaScript
  • Performance — the user sees a blank page until the JS is downloaded and executed
  • Social sharing — Facebook/Twitter bots do not execute JavaScript

Isomorphic JavaScript solves all of these problems.

Server-side rendering with React

React is ideal for the isomorphic approach — renderToString() generates HTML on the server:

var React = require('react');
var ReactDOMServer = require('react-dom/server');
var App = require('./components/App');

app.get('*', function(req, res) {
  var html = ReactDOMServer.renderToString(
    React.createElement(App, { url: req.url })
  );
  res.send('<!DOCTYPE html><html><body><div id="root">' 
    + html + '</div><script src="/bundle.js"></script></body></html>');
});

The client then “hydrates” the server-generated HTML — adding event listeners without re-rendering.

Shared code and routing

The isomorphic approach allows sharing between server and client:

  • Components and templates
  • Routing logic (React Router works on both sides)
  • Validation rules
  • API clients and data transformations
  • Utility functions

This dramatically reduces code duplication and ensures consistency.

Challenges and trade-offs

Isomorphic JS is not free:

  • More complex architecture and debugging
  • The server must handle rendering load
  • Some libraries do not work on the server (DOM manipulation)
  • Managing state between server and client requires careful design

For content-heavy pages with SEO requirements, SSR is almost a necessity. For internal applications behind a login, it is usually not needed.

Conclusion: the best of both worlds

Isomorphic JavaScript combines the advantages of server-side rendering (SEO, fast first paint) with the interactivity of an SPA. React and Node.js form the ideal stack for this approach. For public web applications, we recommend SSR as the default strategy.

isomorphic jsssrserver-side renderingreactnode.jsperformance
Share:

CORE SYSTEMS

Stavíme core systémy a AI agenty, které drží provoz. 15 let zkušeností s enterprise IT.

Need help with implementation?

Our experts can help with design, implementation, and operations. From architecture to production.

Contact us