Skip to content
_CORE
AI & Agentic Systems Core Information Systems Cloud & Platform Engineering Data Platform & Integration Security & Compliance QA, Testing & Observability IoT, Automation & Robotics Mobile & Digital Banking & Finance Insurance Public Administration Defense & Security Healthcare Energy & Utilities Telco & Media Manufacturing Logistics & E-commerce Retail & Loyalty
References Technologies Blog Know-how Tools
About Collaboration Careers
CS EN DE
Let's talk

Kubeflow vs Vertex AI — ML Platforms for Production

12. 12. 2022 Updated: 24. 03. 2026 1 min read CORE SYSTEMSai
This article was published in 2022. Some information may be outdated.
Kubeflow vs Vertex AI — ML Platforms for Production

MLflow serves us well for experiment tracking, but for end-to-end ML pipelines we need more. We tested Kubeflow (self-hosted) and Vertex AI (managed).

Kubeflow on AKS

An open-source ML platform on Kubernetes. Pipelines as DAGs, Jupyter notebooks, Katib for hyperparameter tuning, KFServing for model serving. Advantage: full control. Disadvantage: operationally demanding — upgrading Kubeflow is like upgrading a small operating system.

Vertex AI (GCP)

A managed ML platform from Google. AutoML for non-ML engineers, custom training jobs, managed pipelines, model monitoring. Advantage: zero ops. Disadvantage: vendor lock-in, cost.

Our Decision

A hybrid approach: Kubeflow pipelines for custom workloads on AKS, Vertex AI AutoML for rapid prototypes and smaller projects. MLflow as the shared experiment tracker across both platforms.

There Is No Single Right Platform

It depends on the team, budget, and requirements for control vs. simplicity.

kubeflowvertex aimlopsml platformgcp
Share:

CORE SYSTEMS

We build core systems and AI agents that keep operations running. 15 years of experience with enterprise IT.

Need help with implementation?

Our experts can help with design, implementation, and operations. From architecture to production.

Contact us
Need help with implementation? Schedule a meeting