The average enterprise operates 1,000+ microservices, generates terabytes of logs daily, and its on-call engineer receives 500+ alerts per shift. The human brain can’t process this. AIOps — application of machine learning to IT operations — changes the paradigm from reactive “firefighting” to proactive, self-healing infrastructure. In this article we analyze what AIOps can actually do in 2026, where it fails, and how to deploy it pragmatically.
What AIOps is — and what it isn’t¶
Gartner first defined the term AIOps in 2017 as the combination of big data analytics and machine learning applied to IT operations. Since then it has evolved from marketing buzzword to real engineering discipline with measurable results.
AIOps in practice covers four key areas:
- Anomaly Detection: Automatic detection of deviations in metrics, logs and traces without manual thresholds. ML models learn “normal” behavior and signal statistically significant anomalies.
- Event Correlation: Grouping thousands of alerts into logical incidents. 500 alerts from one root cause = 1 incident, not 500 tickets.
- Root Cause Analysis (RCA): Automatic identification of problem cause in complex dependency graph. Causal inference instead of manual dashboard browsing.
- Auto-Remediation: Automatic fixing of known problems without human intervention. Runbooks driven by ML models that decide when and how to intervene.
What AIOps isn’t: it’s not a replacement for monitoring. Prometheus, Grafana, Datadog — all that remains. AIOps is an intelligence layer over existing observability stack that extracts actionable insights from data.
Why now — three converging trends¶
AIOps has existed for years, but only in 2025–2026 reached inflection point thanks to three factors:
- LLM revolution: Large language models (GPT-4o, Claude, Gemini) can interpret logs, stack traces and configuration files in natural language. RCA changes from pattern matching to reasoning over context. Incident responder can write “why did checkout service crash?” and get structured analysis with evidence.
- OpenTelemetry standardization: OTel became de-facto standard for traces, metrics and logs. Unified data model enables correlation across entire stack — from frontend through backend to infrastructure. Vendor lock-in disappears.
- Complexity explosion: Kubernetes, service mesh, multi-cloud, edge computing — modern infrastructure has thousands of moving parts. Humans can’t handle it. Either you automate or you drown in alerts.
5 levels of AIOps maturity¶
Not every organization needs fully autonomous infrastructure. AIOps is implemented gradually:
| Level | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| L0 — Manual | Static thresholds, manual triage | Alert: CPU > 90% → pager → human fixes |
| L1 — Assisted | ML-driven anomaly detection, but human decides | ML detects latency anomaly, suggests possible causes |
| L2 — Semi-auto | Automatic correlation + RCA, human approves remediation | System identifies root cause, suggests rollback, waits for approve |
| L3 — Auto | Automatic remediation for known scenarios | Memory leak → auto-restart pod, traffic spike → auto-scale |
| L4 — Autonomous | Self-healing infrastructure, predictive actions | Predict capacity exhaustion in 48h → preemptive scale-up |
Most Czech companies are at L0–L1. The goal for 2026 should be reaching L2–L3 for critical systems.
Anomaly Detection — beyond static thresholds¶
Static thresholds (CPU > 80%, response time > 500ms) generate false positives and false negatives. CPU at 85% at 10:00 is normal; at 3:00 it’s an anomaly. Response time 600ms is OK for batch job; for checkout it’s an incident.
Modern anomaly detection uses:
- Seasonal decomposition: STL (Seasonal-Trend decomposition using Loess) decomposes time series into trend, seasonality and residual. Anomaly = statistically significant deviation in residual. Captures daily, weekly and monthly patterns.
- Isolation Forest: Unsupervised ML algorithm optimal for high-dimensional data. Efficiently isolates outliers without need for labeled data. Datadog and Elastic use it internally for metric anomaly detection.
- Transformer-based models: Time series as sequences — transformers (TimesFM from Google, Chronos from Amazon) predict expected behavior and detect deviations. State-of-the-art for multivariate anomaly detection.
- Log anomaly detection: LLM-based parsers extract structured events from unstructured logs. Drain or Brain for log template mining, then statistical analysis of log pattern frequency and sequence. New log pattern system hasn’t seen before? → alert.
Practical tip: Start with golden signals (latency, traffic, errors, saturation). 4 metrics, well-monitored with ML anomaly detection, will catch 80% of incidents. Don’t try to monitor everything at once.
Event Correlation and noise reduction¶
Typical incident in microservices architecture generates cascade of alerts. Database is slow → 50 services timeout → load balancer reports 5xx → health checks fail → Kubernetes restarts pods → new pods start → resource contention grows. Result: 500+ alerts in 5 minutes, all from same root cause.
Event correlation reduces this noise:
- Topology-aware grouping: Knowledge of dependency graph (service A → service B → database) enables grouping alerts into causal chains. Tools: PagerDuty Event Intelligence, BigPanda, Moogsoft.
- Temporal clustering: Alerts in same time window (±2 min) with similar attributes cluster together. DBSCAN or hierarchical clustering on feature vectors (service, severity, message embedding).
- Graph-based correlation: Infrastructure dependency graph + anomaly propagation along edges. If service A depends on B and both have anomaly, correlate them. Knowledge graph technology (Neo4j, Apache AGE) for real-time traversal.
Real results: organizations report 80–95% reduction in alert volume after event correlation deployment. 500 alerts → 5 incidents → 1 root cause.
Root Cause Analysis with LLMs¶
RCA is the most complex and most transformed area of AIOps in 2026. LLM models add reasoning capability — not just pattern matching, but causal reasoning over complex context.
How LLM-powered RCA works in practice:
- Context assembly: System gathers relevant data — anomalous metrics, error logs, traces, recent deployments, config changes, k8s events. Everything compiles into structured context.
- Causal reasoning: LLM analyzes context and proposes hypotheses. “Deploy at 14:23 changed connection pool size from 50 to 10. Database connections saturated at 14:25. Service X latency increased at 14:26. Hypothesis: connection pool change is root cause.”
- Evidence scoring: Each hypothesis is evaluated against data. Does it correlate temporally? Does it match dependency graph? Are there similar incidents in history?
- Recommendation: Top hypothesis with remediation suggestion. “Rollback deploy #4521 or increase connection pool to 50.”
Tools in production:
- Datadog Watchdog RCA: ML-driven root cause analysis integrated into APM. Automatically correlates traces, metrics and logs. LLM-powered natural language summaries since 2025.
- Dynatrace Davis AI: Causal AI engine with topology awareness. Automatically maps dependency graph and propagates root cause. One of most advanced production AIOps systems.
- Grafana Sift: Open-source approach — Grafana plugins for automatic drill-down from alert to root cause through dashboards. LLM integration for data interpretation.
- Custom LLM pipelines: RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) over runbooks, incident history and documentation. Claude or GPT as reasoning engine, vector database as knowledge base. Open-source stack: LangChain + ChromaDB + Prometheus/Loki data.
Auto-Remediation — self-healing infrastructure¶
Auto-remediation is the holy grail of AIOps. System not only detects and diagnoses problem, but fixes it itself. In 2026 this is reality for defined scenarios:
- Kubernetes auto-healing: HPA (Horizontal Pod Autoscaler) for traffic spikes. VPA (Vertical Pod Autoscaler) for resource tuning. PodDisruptionBudgets + rollout strategies for zero-downtime deploys. KEDA for event-driven scaling (queue depth, custom metrics).
- Automated rollback: Canary deploy with automatic rollback when error rate > threshold. Argo Rollouts or Flagger monitor golden signals and rollback deploy if metrics degrade. No human intervention — deploy reverts itself.
- Chaos engineering integration: Litmus, Chaos Mesh — regular failure injection into production. Verifies that auto-remediation actually works. Netflix principle: “If you don’t have chaos testing, you don’t know if your auto-healing works.”
- Runbook automation: PagerDuty Rundeck, Ansible + Event-Driven Ansible (EDA). ML model classifies incident → runs appropriate runbook → executes steps → verifies fix → escalates if fails. Human intervenes only in L3+ scenarios.
Guardrails for auto-remediation¶
Automatic fixing without guardrails is dangerous. System that “fixes” problem can cause worse incident. Key safety mechanisms:
- Blast radius limits: Auto-remediation may affect max X% pods/instances at once. Never restart entire cluster automatically.
- Cooldown periods: After automatic action wait N minutes and verify metrics improved. If not → rollback remediation + escalation.
- Human-in-the-loop for critical systems: Payment processing, health systems — auto-remediation suggests action, human approves. Slack/Teams notification with approve/reject buttons.
- Audit trail: Every automatic action is logged with reason, context and result. Compliance requirement for regulated industries.
Implementation stack for companies¶
Pragmatic AIOps stack you can deploy with existing team:
Open-source foundation¶
# Observability layer
Prometheus + Grafana — metrics and dashboards
Loki — log aggregation
Tempo / Jaeger — distributed tracing
OpenTelemetry Collector — unified data collection
# AIOps layer
Robusta — K8s troubleshooting + auto-remediation
Grafana ML — anomaly detection on Prometheus data
Elasticsearch ML — log anomaly detection
Argo Rollouts — automated canary + rollback
# LLM layer
RAG pipeline (LangChain) — RCA over runbooks + incident history
ChromaDB / Qdrant — vector store for knowledge base
Claude API / local LLM — reasoning engine
Enterprise alternative¶
- Datadog: All-in-one. APM + logs + metrics + Watchdog AI. Fastest time-to-value, but highest TCO.
- Dynatrace: Most advanced AIOps (Davis AI). Automatic discovery, topology mapping, root cause. Ideal for complex enterprise environments.
- Elastic Observability: Open-source core + commercial ML features. Good price/functionality balance. Strong in log analytics.
- Azure Monitor + AI: Native for Azure workloads. Application Insights, Log Analytics, AIOps features integrated into platform. Logical choice for Azure-heavy organizations.
AIOps success metrics¶
AIOps must be measured. Without metrics you don’t know if investment works:
- MTTD (Mean Time To Detect): Time from problem occurrence to detection. Goal: < 2 minutes for P1 incidents. Baseline without AIOps: typically 15–30 minutes.
- MTTR (Mean Time To Resolve): Time from detection to resolution. AIOps goal: 50% reduction. Auto-remediation scenarios: MTTR → 0 (self-healing).
- Alert-to-incident ratio: How many alerts generate 1 incident. Without correlation: 100:1. With AIOps: 5:1. Noise reduction metric.
- False positive rate: How many anomaly detection alerts are real. Goal: < 20% false positives. Too many false positives = alert fatigue = ignoring alerts.
- Auto-remediation coverage: What % of incidents resolve automatically. Start: 10–20%. Mature organization: 60–80% L1/L2 incidents.
- On-call burden: Number of page-outs per engineer per week. Goal: < 2. AIOps eliminates noise and solves trivial incidents automatically.
From firefighters to architects¶
AIOps changes the role of SRE/ops teams from reactive firefighters to architects of self-healing systems. The goal isn’t to eliminate people from operations — the goal is to shift their time from manual alert triage to building more robust infrastructure.
Where to start: OpenTelemetry for standardized data collection. ML anomaly detection on golden signals (4 metrics). Event correlation for noise reduction. This is foundation that brings immediate results — less noise, faster detection, fewer night page-outs.
Auto-remediation and LLM-powered RCA are next phases — build on solid observability foundation, not on buzzwords.
Need help with implementation?
Our experts can help with design, implementation, and operations. From architecture to production.
Contact us