_CORE
AI & Agentic Systems Core Information Systems Cloud & Platform Engineering Data Platform & Integration Security & Compliance QA, Testing & Observability IoT, Automation & Robotics Mobile & Digital Banking & Finance Insurance Public Administration Defense & Security Healthcare Energy & Utilities Telco & Media Manufacturing Logistics & E-commerce Retail & Loyalty
References Technologies Blog Know-how Tools
About Collaboration Careers
CS EN
Let's talk

LLM Observability — Monitoring AI in Production

31. 01. 2026 3 min read CORE SYSTEMSai
LLM Observability — Monitoring AI in Production

Deploying an LLM to production is easy. Keeping it there reliably, efficiently, and hallucination-free — that’s the challenge of 2026. LLM Observability is becoming a new discipline combining traditional monitoring with AI-specific metrics. Here’s how.

Why Classic Monitoring Isn’t Enough

Traditional APM tools excellently monitor latency, throughput, and error rate. But for LLM systems, that’s not enough. A model can return responses with perfect latency and zero error rate — while hallucinating, being toxic, or ignoring context. HTTP 200 doesn’t mean the answer is correct.

LLM Observability therefore adds a new layer of metrics focused on quality, relevance, and safety of generated content. It’s a fundamental shift in what we actually monitor.

Four Pillars of LLM Observability

At CORE SYSTEMS, we work with a four-pillar framework covering the entire LLM lifecycle in production:

1. Trace & Span Monitoring

Every LLM call is a complex pipeline — prompt construction, retrieval, reranking, inference, post-processing. OpenTelemetry with LLM-specific semantic conventions (standardized in 2025) enables tracing the entire chain:

  • Latency of individual steps (retrieval vs. inference vs. post-processing)
  • Token consumption per request (input/output/reasoning tokens)
  • Cache hit rate for embedding and retrieval layers
  • Retry and fallback events between models

2. Quality & Relevance Metrics

This is where LLM Observability brings real innovation. In 2026, metrics like these have been established:

  • Faithfulness score: The degree to which the answer is grounded in provided context (RAG grounding)
  • Answer relevance: How much the answer actually responds to the posed question
  • Hallucination detection: Automatic detection of factual claims not supported by context
  • Semantic drift: Tracking whether answer quality changes over time (model degradation)

Crucially, these metrics are computed automatically in real time — using smaller evaluation models (LLM-as-judge) or specialized classifiers.

3. Cost & Efficiency Tracking

LLM costs can escalate faster than cloud compute costs did in 2020. We track:

  • Cost per query: Total cost of one user interaction including retrieval and re-ranking
  • Token efficiency: Ratio of useful vs. system tokens in the prompt
  • Model routing analytics: Smart routing effectiveness (simple query → cheap model, complex → expensive)
  • Caching ROI: How much money semantic cache and prompt cache save

4. Safety & Compliance

Especially in regulated industries (finance, healthcare, public administration), safety monitoring is critical:

  • PII detection: Automatic detection of personal data in prompts and responses
  • Toxicity monitoring: Real-time classification of inappropriate content
  • Prompt injection detection: Catching model manipulation attempts
  • Audit trail: Complete log of all interactions for regulatory purposes

Tools and the 2026 Ecosystem

The LLM Observability tools market is consolidating in 2026 around several categories:

  • Langfuse, Arize Phoenix: Open-source platforms for LLM tracing and evaluation. Strong developer experience, weaker enterprise features.
  • Datadog LLM Monitoring, Dynatrace AI Observability: Enterprise APM vendors with LLM extensions. Advantage: integration with existing monitoring stack.
  • Weights & Biases, MLflow: MLOps platforms expanding into production monitoring. Strong in experiment tracking and model registry.
  • Custom stacks: OpenTelemetry + Prometheus + Grafana with LLM-specific dashboards. Popular with Czech companies for flexibility and zero vendor lock-in.

Practical Implementation in Czech Enterprise

Based on our experience, we recommend a gradual LLM Observability rollout:

  • Week 1–2: OpenTelemetry instrumentation of all LLM calls. Basic trace/span monitoring.
  • Week 3–4: Cost tracking and alerting on anomalies (token consumption spikes, unexpected model fallbacks).
  • Month 2: Quality metrics — faithfulness and relevance scoring on a sample (10–20% of traffic).
  • Month 3: Full quality monitoring, safety checks, dashboards for business stakeholders.

Important: Don’t start by boiling the ocean. You’ll get the first 80% of value from traces, cost tracking, and basic quality scoring. Add sophisticated evaluations iteratively.

Observability Is a Prerequisite, Not Nice-to-Have

In 2026, running LLMs in production without observability is like driving a car blindfolded. You might be lucky — but it doesn’t work long-term. Investment in LLM monitoring pays back through lower costs, higher quality, and regulatory compliance.

Our tip: Start with OpenTelemetry instrumentation and cost tracking. In two weeks, you’ll have a clear picture of what your LLM stack is actually doing — and how much it costs.

llmobservabilitymonitoringmlops
Share:

CORE SYSTEMS

Stavíme core systémy a AI agenty, které drží provoz. 15 let zkušeností s enterprise IT.

Need help with implementation?

Our experts can help with design, implementation, and operations. From architecture to production.

Contact us