Terraform is multi-cloud. CloudFormation is AWS-only. Why would we want a vendor-specific tool? Because CloudFormation is native — drift detection, stack events, rollback, integration with every AWS service from day one.
Stacks and Templates¶
AWSTemplateFormatVersion: '2010-09-09'
Description: Web application stack
Resources:
WebServer:
Type: AWS::EC2::Instance
Properties:
ImageId: ami-0c55b159cbfafe1f0
InstanceType: t2.micro
SecurityGroupIds:
- !Ref WebSecurityGroup
Tags:
- Key: Name
Value: web-server
WebSecurityGroup:
Type: AWS::EC2::SecurityGroup
Properties:
GroupDescription: Web server security group
SecurityGroupIngress:
- IpProtocol: tcp
FromPort: 80
ToPort: 80
CidrIp: 0.0.0.0/0
Outputs:
PublicIP:
Value: !GetAtt WebServer.PublicIp
CloudFormation vs. Terraform¶
CF advantages: Native drift detection, automatic rollback on failure, stack events for auditing, no state file management. Terraform advantages: Multi-cloud, better HCL syntax, plan command, larger community of modules.
Our strategy: Terraform for multi-cloud and infrastructure, CloudFormation for AWS-specific services (Lambda, API Gateway, CloudFront) where CF has better support.
Both Tools Have Their Place¶
CloudFormation for deep AWS integration, Terraform for flexibility. The important thing is to have infrastructure as code — the specific tool is secondary.
Need help with implementation?
Our experts can help with design, implementation, and operations. From architecture to production.
Contact us